6TH CHINA SHANGHAI INTERNATIONAL PIANO COMPETITION
Semi Finals
Friday (9 November 2012 )
Six pianists have been selected for the
semi-finals, which consists of a 45 minute programme to include a newly
commissioned work and two Richard Strauss lieder, accompanying a soprano. These
specific requirements may be performed in any sequence during the allotted
time.
The Chinese composer Wang Jianzhong (right), whose commissioned work Capriccio was performed by the semi-finalists, speaks with Chinese jury member Wu Ying. |
The new work was Capriccio by Wang Jianzhong, the venerated Chinese composer and
transcriber of such popular standards like Liu
Yang River, Calm River in an Autumn
Night and Thousand Birds Pay Homage
to the Phoenix. It is a pleasant 7-minute scherzo-like piece in sonata
form, with a skittish ballabile contrasted
with a more lyrical second theme. It does not sound explicitly Chinese, but its
predominance of the whole tone scale and use of arpeggios point clearly to
Debussy as an influence. Claude-Achille goes to Shanghai perhaps? All the
pianists gave competent and even sympathetic accounts, and I would hazard to
say that the Chinese pianists do not have a distinct advantage here. Anyway,
they were playing to a mostly Western jury, although the composer himself was
in attendance in all the rounds. All performed with the score, with the
exception of Bruno Vlahek who had the chutzpah
of commiting it to memory.
With both pianist and soprano dressed in stunning red, is this the :Red Detachment of Women"? The partially obstructing handbag belongs to Oxana Yablonskaya. Ah,... women! |
I really do not see the point of having Lieder
accompaniment as an essential part of a competition. What if a pianist does not
accompany well although the rest of his playing is excellent? Will that
militate against his or her inclusion in the finals? Anyway, it gave us all the
pleasure of hearing and seeing the very pretty soprano Li Qian, attired in hong bao red, in the varied delights of
Richard Strauss’s Cacilie and Morgen!
The semi-finals opened with HAO YILEI (China ), who had impressed
with his prodigiousness in the quarter-finals. In my opinion, it was a mistake
of his to build a semi-final programme wholly on short pieces. He started with
four varied Scarlatti sonatas, and without playing any repeats, gave only a
fleeting impression of the pieces. The same applied to the five Scriabin Etudes from Op.8, despite displaying
much proficiency in their thorny technical challenges. The fearsome Study in Thirds (Op.8 No.10) completed
an impressive showing. The larger pieces were Une barque sur l’ocean and Alborada
del gracioso from Ravel’s Miroirs, which provided a wash of colour and rather smooth glissandi.
ZHU
WANCHEN
(China ) clearly has the
fingers for Chopin’s First Ballade in
G minor (Op.23), but in his efforts to impress by sheer velocity and going for
broke, he missed more than a few notes along the way. His view of Schubert’s
late Sonata in C minor (D.958) was a
very persuasive one, even if it was that of a young person unburdened by the
weariness of the world. The tragi-heroic opening resounded with a declamatory
salute, contrasted with lyrical Lieder-like moments that portended drama and
tragedy. He seems to revel in those vertiginous runs on the right hand, which
held no terrors for this speedster. The under-stated beauty of the slow movement
however revealed him at his best, a sensitive soul when he chooses to be. The
tarantella finale was repetitious (as Schubert’s finales tend to be), but he
kept it interesting with a fleet-fingered approach, some nice touches and the
sort of humour that best defines Schubert’s music.
The only woman in the semi-finals was LIU YILIN (China ), who wisely chose just
two Scarlatti sonatas – in F major (K.518) and F minor (K.481) – and without
eschewing the repeats. Clean staccato playing, distinguished by clarity and
fluidity in the former contrasted well with the sorrow and desolation evoked in
the latter. Advantage Liu over Hao. In Prokofiev’s Sixth Sonata in A major (Op.82), she gave a surprisingly nuanced
performance, balancing a pulverising brute force in the outer movements with
lyricism and droll wit of the middle movements. With her, the pauses and
silences between passages meant something special. Even the lacerating finale
was gradually built up from a calm sotto
voce to the final scorching conflagration. It was not guns blazing from the
start, and that worked psychologically to perfection. The re-introduction of
the first movement’s motif also became a moment to remember. I was about to
hail this performance to be the equal of Yuja Wang’s (at the 2010 Singapore
International Piano Festival) when a bad stumble near the finish line
threatened to derail her earlier sterling efforts.
BRUNO
VLAHEK
(Croatia ) was the first of two
non-Chinese semi-finalists to perform. True to his penchant for offbeat
repertoire, he opened with Grieg’s 18-minute long Ballade in G minor. Unlike Chopin’s famous number, this is in the
theme and variations form, much akin to Mendelssohn’s spectacular Variations Serieuses. The work does plod
on for a while, but his playing was always engaging, making each variation
count. And there was always something interesting about, the finery of filigree
or the jocularity of a folkdance. Grieg even provides a false ending, in an
unresolved E flat major chord, a longish pause before closing in the home key.
Vlahek worked these to a fine art. After the set-pieces, he closed with the
Liszt-Busoni Fantasia on Two Motifs from
Mozart’s The Marriage of Figaro. These motifs were, of course, from Non piu andrai and Voi che sapete. It is an exhausting work for both pianist and
listener, and by mid-way, he had lost me. The closing was nothing more than a
succession of loud notes and cascades, which by this time, had become a bit of
a bore. In the words of Emperor Franz Josef to Mozart on one of his operas, I
quote, “Too many notes, my friend.”
HENRY
KRAMER
(USA ) appears to be the most
confident pianist of the lot, one who is totally comfortable with himself. This
showed in his playing here, as in the quarter-final round. Beginning with
Chopin’s Fourth Ballade in F minor
(Op.52), his reading came close to the perfect conception of this masterpiece,
opening with unadorned simplicity and working his way through the variations to
a feverish climax. Even in the terrifying coda, absolute clarity and no
over-pedalling concluded this moving and probing account. Only in a piano
competition will one get to hear two performances of Prokofiev’s Sixth Sonata in the same afternoon. It
is a wearying piece but in Kramer’s hands, all the contrasts came out very
well. He packed in more savage power than the slender Liu, but had his own
moment of insecurity in the first movement. He captured well the paradox that
is Prokofiev, brutality and sentimentality to equal degree. The finale was
encapsulated not by a binding onslaught of loud notes, but mystery and menace,
which in my opinion is a far more potent force.
The final semi-finalist was JIN WENBIN (China ) who began his solos with
the eight Fantasiestucke (Op.12) by
Schumann. For me he is the pianist who expresses the greatest joy and
wonderment in his playing. Everything comes across as fresh and unhackneyed, as
he has always something interesting to convey, even in the most familiar of
pieces. The full gamut of feelings and expressions were gratefully realised in
these pieces, from the gentle lyricism of Des
Abends to the dizzying delights of Traumes
Wirren. Being devastatingly accurate was just part of the story, the whimsy
and intimacy offered were far more valuable qualities. To round off a totally
musical outing was Liszt’s rather vulgar transcription of the Waltz from Gounod’s Faust. In his view, it sounds positively joyous as his flying
fingers took it into the realm of fantasy. There is a section for ad-libbing,
which he reciprocated with the most magical of scales and the most even and
gentlest trilling of a nightingale.
I have two rather obvious standouts for finalist
status: HENRY KRAMER and JIN WENBIN. The third final spot ought
go to either LIU YILIN or ZHU WANCHEN. The jury must have read my
mind as they opted for as their top three:
LIU YILIN
HENRY
KRAMER and
JIN WENBIN
With no Rachmaninov, Tchaikovsky or Brahms concertos
figuring in the finals on Sunday, it looks like it is going to be a rather
short evening.
Pianomaniacs unite! The world's greatest piano competition buff Dr Gustav Alink meets with Singapore's most rabid piano competition buff. |
No comments:
Post a Comment