SYMPHONY
92.4FM
YOUNG
TALENTS PROJECT 2014
GALA
CONCERT
MediaCorp
Television Theatre
Friday (27 June 2014 )
After too many years of purveying programming
mediocrity, Singapore ’s only classical radio
station Symphony 92.4FM has finally come up with a project that is laudable and
worthwhile preserving. Its Young Talent Project, now in its third year, is a
music competition that identifies top young classical talent in the nation
under the age of 15 years.
It is almost an equivalent of the well-established
BBC Young Musician of the Year Competition in the United Kingdom , which has helped
established the careers of artists like Nicola Benedetti, Jennifer Pike, Emma
Johnson and Freddy Kempf, just to name a few “big names” in today’s classical musical
scene. Even those who participated but did not win included the likes of Stephen
Hough, Barry Douglas, Steven Osborne, Benjamin Grosvenor and Michael Collins.
Not too shabby indeed.
Past winners and finalists of the BBC Young Musician of the Year Competition are a stellar cast indeed. Can Singapore do the same thing? |
In many ways, this MediaCorp initiative
complements the National Piano & Violin Competition (NPVC, organised by the
National Arts Council) but has a couple of significant advantages. First, it
features instrumentalists other than pianists and violinists, including voices,
and secondly, it enjoys the coverage of mass media like television and radio. A
winner of this competition could actually become a media celebrity if there is
adequate follow-up in succeeding years. This competition does hark back to the
halcyon years of television’s Talentime
in the 1960s through early 80s, which has all but been replaced by reality
television’s Singapore Idol and
similar programmes. Was it not in one of the early Talentime episodes that violinist Lynnette Seah (Singapore
Symphony’s Co-Leader) won a prize for her performance of Sarasate’s Gypsy Airs?
I was fortunate to be able to attend this year’s
Gala Concert which highlighted the top 10 talents of 2014, and was pleasantly surprised by the very high quality of the performances. The event was not aired
“live”, which explained a somewhat slack and laid back feel to the proceedings,
which ran almost to three hours. True to television rather than a live concert,
all the instruments were amplified, often to the disadvantage of the
performances. There was a artificially reverberant and swimmy acoustic
throughout all performances, and the pianists bore the brunt of this. But I am
quite certain that it will all look and sound very nice on the boob-tube come 5
July on the Okto channel.
Here are my observations of the young talents
and their performances. Everyone was on the top of their game and there were to
be no ciphers among them.
The first to perform, JOLENE CHEN (12 years, piano) set the bar very high with an
impressive reading of the Glinka-Balakirev The
Lark. The Russian folksong has a simple melody, which came through very
well above the ornamental filigree. The technically tricky cadenzas were also
overcome with impeccable technique and relative ease. My verdict: A very accomplished performance.
The only harpist in this cohort is SAPPHIRE HO (14), who had attracted a
very large following to the studio, including the entire I-Sis Trio. Like the
earlier performer, her work was another Russian showpiece, Walter-Kuene’s Eugene Onegin Fantasy based on themes
from Tchaikovsky’s opera. Fairly similar to Paul Pabst’s fantasy on the same
for piano, this rehashes the famous Waltz
and Lenski’s Aria to great
effect, and Sapphire never let the tension slacken for a moment. Even if there
were a few minor hitches along the way, but the performance was very assured
and she can only get better. Verdict:
Another winning reading.
The first violinist to perform was JOEY LAU (14) who performed Sarasate’s Zigeunerweisen (Gypsy Airs) accompanied by Lim Yan on piano. Sometimes this work
feels overplayed but Joey prevented it from sounding trite or bored. She got
most of the technical tricks in the first movement spot on, and was all
sweetness in the short slow movement. The rip-roaring finale played to her
strengths, and she does instil a genuine gypsy elan to the proceedings. Verdict: Brava!
DANIEL LOO (11, piano) is the
archetypal talent one invariably encounters in the Junior Category of the
National Piano & Violin Competition. He is honed to perfection in playing a
handful of set-pieces, polished to a fine sheen and blest with the requisite
showmanship. Not a note was missed in Debussy’s Prelude from Pour le piano,
and the reverberant sound militates to his favour. Its sweeping glissandi are
excellently executed and he adds a theatrical pumping of the fist at the end of
the work for dramatic effect. Verdict:
Epitome of pianist as kung fu
exponent.
Little DAN
YUET IAN (8, cello) has the cute factor working for him but he does not
know it yet. One is amazed who someone this young has already mastered all the
notes in Popper’s Hungarian Fantasy,
a thorny showpiece which brings together many familiar melodies which may be
found in a number of Liszt’s Hungarian
Rhapsodies. Its difficulties are just swept away as nonchalantly as water
off a duck’s back and his brilliant ending brings out many cheers from the
audience. Verdict: Have we already
found a winner?
I had earlier heard CHEN TIANQI (12, violin) a month ago in Suzhou , where he won 1st
prize in the Suzhou-Singapore Young Talents Competition. Part of his prize was
an all-expenses paid trip here to perform for the big prize. If anything, he
performed even better here, displaying a very secure technique in the 1st
movement of de Beriot’s Violin Concerto
No.7, including a fearsome series of double-stops from its outset. He has a
clear and generous tone, and makes the work sound better than it is. Verdict: Suzhou ’s best is an even match
with Singapore ’s best.
MAXIMUS
RENJIRO
(9, piano) is the regional champion of Indonesia , the fourth most
populous nation in the world and Singapore ’s immediate neighbour.
Talent abounds in that nation and what I heard is a tiny tip of an iceberg.
Maximus performed two of the Six Dances
in Bulgarian Rhythms from Bartok’s Mikrokosmos,
which is an unusually narrow choice of repertoire. Fast and voluminous playing
seems to be the order here, and while there is no doubting his talent, perhaps
a better selection could have served his cause better. Verdict: A natural talent who could shine further in more
appropriate repertoire.
KAELYN SOH (8, violin) is also blessed
with the cute factor, and she knows it all too well. This attribute is maxed to
perfect effect in her fearless performance of Sarasate’s Scherzo-Tarantella. Not only does she get all the notes, she seems
to be thoroughly enjoying the entire process. With the television camera
zooming in, her facial expressions are fully captured; there is no grimacing or
fake posturing, only broad smiles, and the music smiles with her from start to
finish. Verdict: A certain winner, and
let us hope she can further develop from this.
ZANTHA TAN (14, piano) is at the
upper age-limit of the competition and that maturity is reflected in her
playing of Granados’s Allegro de
Concierto. It is a coruscating showpiece, and she brings out all its
details, including a singing line that could easily have been lost in the
torrents of flying notes. A passionate and very confident performer who will
soon be at the crossroads of what she wants to do with her life. Verdict: If she opts for music, she
will do very well.
AODEN TEO (12, cello) is already
a winner, having snagged the HSBC Youth Excellence Award for musical talent
worth $200,000 last year. So the $2000 of this competition seems like small
beer. He gave a repeat performance of Saint-Saens’ First Cello Concerto, but only played its first movement. This does
not actually end with a strong cadence but instead fades away to nothing, which
proves an anti-climax. He displays a strong technique, with good and healthy
sound but one feels he could have come up with a better choice of work for this
competition. Verdict: Does not
really need to win this one.
The jury of conductor turned MediaCorp
Vice-President Wang Ya-Hui, virtuoso violinist Siow Lee-Chin, double-bass
player Wei Yung-Chiao and NAC bigwig Pearl Samuel took almost an eternity to
make their decision. In the meantime, the audience was treated by performances
of previous winners and other stand-outs from the competition.
This photo gives you an idea how young and tiny these massive talents actually are. The winner Kaelyn Soh is third from the right, beside the two youngest players who are 7 years old. |
The overall winner who receives $2000 and a
scholarship for masterclasses by the Amadeus Academy in Vienna was KAELYN SOH. Not a great surprise here.
The winner of the $2000 Symphony 92.4FM prize was SAPPHIRE HO, while the Audience Prize of $1000 went to DAN YUET IAN. Congratulations all
around.
This competition holds great promise, and I can
see it expanding over the years to come. If taken on with greater support from
the National Arts Council, it can become a national event akin to the NPVC, one
that highlights a wider range of instrumentalists, not just pianists and
violinists. The usual complaint that the NAC does not support cello, bass,
woodwind, brass, percussion players and singers can be easily addressed with
the merging of the two competitions. The publicity from television and radio
would further enhance the profile of the competition. Furthermore, the upper
age limit may be raised to 18, like the BBC competition, which will attract
more mature talent (wind, brass players and singers take a little longer to
mature), not just the cute ones.
I look forward to the 2015 edition, which I am
sure will be equally enthralling.
All photos courtesy of MediaCorp Symphony 92.4FM.
No comments:
Post a Comment