SYDNEY
INTERNATIONAL PIANO
COMPETITION OF AUSTRALIA 2016
Preliminaries
Round 2
Monday
11 July 2016 (12.30 pm)
EDWARD NEEMAN (Australia, 32 years)
appears to have a better second round, opening with Mendessohn's Fantasy in
F sharp minor (Op.28), sometimes referred to as his Scottish Sonata.
There is a good mix of sensitive playing and prestidigitation, as expected from
the German, before taking an interlude with Chopin's Mazurka in C sharp
minor (Op.63 No.3), crafted with lilting charm. Then its all set for Scriabin's
Fifth Sonata, his “Poem of Ecstasy” on the piano. As with the earlier
pieces, there is lots of over-pedalling which results in blurring of passages,
while concealing some missed notes.
The major contribution of WANG YINFEI
(China, 30 years) is Beethoven's final Sonata No.32 in C minor (Op.111),
which received an assured performance, despite missed notes in the first
movement. At least he understands Beethoven's passion and concept of “brio”.
The Arietta theme and variations in the second movement are beautifully
negotiated, and that “jazzy” or “ragtime” variation gets the syncopated
attention it deserves. Vine's Toccatissimo sounds over-pedalled in the
beginning but gets better later. But will this be enough for him?
YUI FUSHIKI (Japan, 25 years) has
been my preferred pianist of this session, and continued to impress with
Haydn's Sonata No.34 in E minor, with some drama and humour to equal
degree in the first movement, elegance and clear lines in the slow movement and
a chirpy, cheery finale to close.
Completely different is a rare hearing of Bartok's Dance Suite in
his original piano transcription. Forget Franz Liszt, as this is a true
Hungarian rhapsody with its multiple linked movements played with clear,
incisive accents, with requisite colour and texture, through its journey of
dissonance and pentatonics to a brilliant end. The opulence of an orchestra is
not relived, but she got the spirit right.
LUU QUANG HONG (Vietnam, 25 years) is
the only pianist to offer all five of Carl Vine's Bagatelles. These are
perfect miniatures, like a suite, which got the varied and nuanced playing they
deserved. The final Threnody never fails to touch, with its beguiling
melody and sheer simplicity. Following that were the strident octave tritones
of Liszt's Dante Sonata, arrestingly announced in a performance of
sufficient contrasts. There was a minor stumble, and despite that, got his
message across loud and clear. A stronger second round that may have come a
little too late.
Monday 11 July 2016 (3.30 pm)
CHEN MOYE (China, 32 years) is
another dark horse in this competition. As to the question whether Xie Ming's
account of Percy Grainger's Ramble on Love from Der Rosenkavalier could
be bettered, Chen provided that answer with an equally impressive performance
of warm and generous tones, if not quite approximating the former's
sensuousness. Chen however swept the board with Rachmaninov's Second Sonata
in Vladimir Horowitz's version that combines both 1913 and 1931 editions. Its a
slightly longer work than those offered earlier, and in certain ways better
being more fleshed out. Unlike Horowitz's volatile and often jerky live
performances, Chen is polished to a fine sheen but still possessing that always
nervy edge that is simply thrilling. He will go through.
KONG JIANING (China, 30 years) is
likely to join him with his 30 minutes of short pieces. First off were two
Scarlatti Sonatas (K.454 and 455), both in G major and played fast with
staccatos as the main emphasis. The twins were very well played, yet having a
character and personality of their own. Just as impressive was Kong's traversal
of 11 Etudes from Op.25 by Chopin. To fit the playing time, the slow C
sharp minor Etude (No.7) was omitted. So we got to hear all the fast
ones, each delicately yet prodigiously crafted. Special place go to the
fearsome G sharp minor (No.6) in triplets, B minor (No.10) for bilateral
octaves and A minor (No.11), the blustery “Winter Wind” which was
breathtaking to say the least.
FANTEE JONES (USA, 22 years)
provided an element of surprise by programming two Chopin Waltzes, the
slow and nostalgic F minor (Op.70 No.2) contrasted with the vertiginous F major
(Op.34 No.3) which were played much charm. The dance thread continued into
Schumann's Carnaval Op.9, with its short Scenes Mignonettes involving
characters of commedia delle arte and Schumann's own League of David, a
number of which included waltzes. Her playing is of lusty immediacy which
worked well with in louder Florestan pieces, but tends to get clattery with the
virtuosic ones like and Reconnaissance and Paganini. Curiously
she follows Rachmaninov's example by including the enigmatic Sphinxes, a
mere sequence of bare notes based on the motto theme. Practically nobody else
does that.
TONY LEE (Australia, 24 years)
gave a very lucid account of Cesar Franck's Prelude, Choral et Fugue, a
dead serious work that tends to get dragged down by its own seriousness and
weight. Thankfully, he does none of that and his reading gets more and more
engaging as the fugue progressed to its finality. The selection of Arthur
Benjamin's Etudes Improvisees and Scherzino, very engaging short pieces,
was also excellent. He finished off with Scriabin's Sonata No.4, which
began with less allure than expected, but got airborne in the Prestissimo
volando for an unerring finish.
The attendances at the competition were very good despite being in the early rounds. |
Unfortunately, my journey with the Sydney
International Piano Competition of Australia (where else, Scotland?) ends here
with an all too regrettable return “up above” to Singapore. At least I got to
hear all 32 pianists, 50 minutes of each in total, some 15,100 minutes of piano
playing and more if one considered the young Australian Showcase pianists, a
veritable feast of music. My short capsule reviews were of the live performance
as I heard them without recourse to viewing the archived videos later on.
The overall standard has been
bewilderingly good, a vast improvement from the 2004 and 2008 competitions I
attended (and 2012 which I followed on the Internet), when some pianists
(including semi-finalists) could barely play themselves out of a paper bag.
There will be a big number of excellent pianists who will be prematurely
eliminated, and that will be because the cut is larger this time (from 32 to 12
this year, rather than 32 to 20, and 20 to 12 in previous editions). My guess
is that several would have been cut just by a matter of a fraction of jury
votes. It seems unfair, but that is the reality of competition. Suffice to say,
there have been no duds, and the semi-finalists and finalists will all have
been excellent and more.
So who gets to the semi-finals? My picks
were as follows (in the order of playing):
RASHKOVSKIY
JURINIC
TARASEVICH-NIKOLAEV
LEBHARDT
XIE MING
GUGNIN
POOM PROMMACHART
DANIEL LE
SHEVCHENKO
YUI FUSHIKI
CHEN MOYE
KONG JIANING
Others to consider:
BROBERG
HA GYU TAE
MALMGREN
GOUGH
JEREMY SO
MELNIKOV
Here are the judges' picks for the 12
semi-finalists:
BROBERG
HA GYU TAE
TARASEVICH-NIKOLAEV
BELYAVSKIY
XIE MING
GUGNIN
MELNIKOV
POOM PROMMACHART
SHEVCHENKO
CHEN MOYE
KONG JIANING
TONY LEE
May the best man (or one woman) win!
2 comments:
Thank you for your insightful and comprehensive review of all the competitors. You were also pretty accurate with the choices. I myself went to a few live performances and have been listening on the radio (ABC Classic FM) and watching on the competition website, however have found a dearth of commentary on the internet about this competition so it is great to see it here. The audience members are full of piano teachers and chatting to them is very interesting!
What did you think of the chamber and 18th century concerto rounds? I thought Tarasevich-Nikolaev did very well in both the Dvorak quintet and Mozart concerto. Chen is also very consistent.
Thank you for reading! It's a pity I did not get a chance to stay on for the semi-final rounds, which I'm sure were enthralling. Because of work, it was also difficult for me to catch the streaming broadcasts. So I have not written anything beyond the first two rounds.
Suffice to say, the eventual winners had already shown their mettle in the early rounds, thus surviving the cut and going on to shine in the semis and finals. Based on that, I had earlier shared with some friends that the Russians (Gugnin and Tarasevich-Nikolaev) were going to win it this year while Chen was going to be the dark horse. So they were all consistent, and that's what makes competition winners.
I was also rooting for my friends among the competitors - Rashkovskiy, Cheung, Poom and Le - and they had varied results. That's the way with competitions, a showcase of talent but what they make of their musical careers is up to them, and has ultimately little to do with the competition. We can only wish them all the best.
Post a Comment